1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

(a) In the land survey division drawn up in the Japanese Occupation Period, Gyeonggi-gun, Gwangju-gun Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant lot number land”) D 1,991. (hereinafter “the instant lot number land”) 191

6.30. Circumstances shall be written;

나. 이 사건 모지번 토지 중 4평은 1943. 5. 3. 소화(昭和) 18년 5월 3일(을 제11호증의 3). 위 B로 분할되었고, 이후 행정구역 및 지목 변경 등을 거쳐 서울 강동구 B 도로 13㎡(이하 ‘이 사건 토지’라고 한다)로 되었다.

C. On January 11, 1994, the Defendant issued a registration of preservation of ownership under the name of the Defendant on September 3, 1994 as the receipt of the registration office of the Seoul Eastern District Court on September 3, 1994.

On the other hand, upon the death of December 31, 1935, D inherited D’s property solely by way of family inheritance in preference to the father F, G, etc. born after its adoption, and upon the death of May 11, 1947, H, his/her mother, inherited E’s property solely by inheritance of Australia. After the death on March 4, 1984, H died on the part of his/her wife and children, J, K, L, M, and N jointly inherited H’s property.

Since May 2, 1985, I died on May 2, 1985, and jointly succeeded to the property of J, K, L, M, and N, which are their children. In other words, the J died on July 2, 1986 and jointly succeeded to P, Q, and R, their wife and children. On December 15, 1992, K died and died on December 15, 1992, and C, which is its wife, jointly succeeded to her property. L died on May 19, 201, and U and V jointly succeeded to her own property.

E. Under the foregoing circumstances, O, P, Q, R, Plaintiff, S, T, U,V, M, and N, who jointly inherited the D’s property, agreed on the division of inherited property that the Plaintiff solely inherited D’s property around August 2018, during which the instant lawsuit was pending.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 3, 7, 17, and Eul.