1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Basic Facts

With respect to the forest of this case, D (L) with the address in Jri “Jri” (on the present administrative district, “Kriri” under the administrative district) was described as being under the circumstances on October 5, 1917, and the forest of this case is currently unregistered.

On the other hand, H (M and permanent domicile: N) was born and living in the military on December 24, 1948 without the male descendants who were to succeed to the family, and jointly succeeded to the property of E and F, his wife, who were married from the military domicile on December 24, 1948, by one half of their own shares. E died on October 10, 1996, and jointly succeeded to the property of P, Q, R, R, S, and Plaintiff A as one fifth shares of their own shares. F was deceased on January 11, 2003 and jointly succeeded to the property of T, who is their children, and U, one half shares of each of their respective shares. On November 28, 2006, L jointly succeeded to the property of 5/9 shares, 50 shares, 50 children, X, and 29/2 shares.

After all, the property of H(M), such as the attached inheritance shares list, was inherited by the Plaintiff A through E, and the Plaintiff B via F and T, inherited the shares of 1/10.

[The grounds for recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, and Gap evidence Nos. 9 (including each number), and the summary of the plaintiffs' claim as to the grounds for claim as to the whole purport of the pleadings are the forests and fields under the circumstances of H (M). H (M) died on December 24, 1948 without the male's descendants to inherit Australia and jointly inherited his/her property by E-F, his/her wife, who died on Oct. 10, 1996 and died on Oct. 10, 1996, and thereby the plaintiff Eul, his/her children, died on Nov. 11, 2003, and Eul shared his/her property and died on Nov. 28, 2006, thereby enabling the plaintiff 18/10 shares of the forest in this case against the defendant 18/10 shares of the forest in this case.

Judgment

A.