The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 5,410,00 per annum from October 11, 2014 to June 9, 2015 and the next day.

Facts of recognition

The Plaintiff entered into a contract of carriage with the Defendant on July 29, 2014 to transport the instant machinery to the same-dong Electronic Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Dong-dong Electronic”) located in Busan (hereinafter referred to as “Dong-si”) in order to repair the food equipment used in the instant plant (hereinafter referred to as “instant machinery”) while completing business registration with the name of “C” at 751 of Kimpo-si Building 751 (hereinafter referred to as the “instant plant”).

(hereinafter “instant transport contract”). D, an employee of the Defendant, was delivered from the Plaintiff to the collection center of the instant goods, and the machinery of this case was destroyed by a marbling machine operation division, etc.

(hereinafter “instant accident.” Around August 5, 2014, the Plaintiff requested repair by sending the instant machinery to the same-sex. On August 14, 2014, the e-mail estimated the repair cost of the instant machinery to KRW 11,960,000, the e-mail estimated the repair cost of the instant machinery to be KRW 11,960,000, and returned the instant machinery to the Plaintiff on September 15, 2014 by using the food type operating parts provided by the Plaintiff. The repair cost was paid by the Plaintiff on the aggregate of KRW 6,006,00 (value of KRW 5,460,000, value-added tax of KRW 546,000) with the repair cost on January 15, 2015 and March 3, 2015.

On September 1, 2014, the Plaintiff entrusted E with 11,000,000 won of 12,000,000 won of blurg processing on the rise rise around September 1, 201, and the Plaintiff entrusted E with 11,00,000 won of 16 September 2014.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant consignment processing.” The Plaintiff paid 5,000 won value-added tax of 50,000 won (value-added tax of 50,000 won) to the same person on April 10, 2012 and October 16, 2013, respectively, for the repair cost of food equipment, etc. purchased and used by the Plaintiff, including the instant machinery, from the same kind of electronics.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 through 9, entry of Eul 1 and 3 evidence (including a branch number) and video of these courts, and the like electronics of this Court.