logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.05.18 2018고정176
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 10, 2017, the Defendant destroyed the 300,000 won of the television owned by the victim D hotel because of a small amount of television noise within the D hotel hotel room 916 located in Busan, Daegu, Busan, the Defendant destroyed the 300,000 won of the repair cost.

2. Around 11:40 on August 10, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was arrested as a current offender from the Victim H(26) who was a policeman in the Shipping Station in charge of the marine transportation police station located in Busan, Busan, the Defendant: (b) was arrested of the victim H (26) who was a policeman in charge of the hotel room manager in the hotel under paragraph (1) and was transferred to the said district; and (c) was in custody of the said district in order to ensure the safety of the Defendant, the victimized person was able to sit in the protection seat of the Defendant and to ensure the safety of the Defendant; (d) the damaged person was able to take the front of the said seat; and (e) the damaged person was able to take the victim’s left hand with the right handkh.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers regarding the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes, and at the same time, the Defendant placed approximately two weeks of medical treatment on the victim, such as hand, hand, hand, and other parts of the crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. G statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in written opinions;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the fact that a victim of a crime obstructing the execution of official duties wishes to punish the defendant and that the damage is not likely to have been restored (unfavorable circumstances) and damage to the crime committed by destruction.

arrow