A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 28, 2018, at around 14:30, 2018, the Defendant: (a) found the victim’s damage and interference with his duties under the influence of alcohol in the Busan Shipping Daegu D Caf, Busan, which was operated by the victim C; (b) laid the victim’s carpets on the floor, without any justifiable reason, the victim’s share of at least 100,000 won in the market value of the victim’s possession; and (c) damaged the victim’s carpets by force, such as cutting down the rain, walking out the rain, and talking the victim with the rain, i.e., e., “such dogbs, sark kack,” and hacking the victim’s carpets by force.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the above date, at the above place, and at the place of 112 reported and sent out by the police officer F belonging to the Maritime Police Station E District, and expressed the desire to “this Chewing few, n.e., f., the police officer,” and “f.e., the police officer’s performance of duties by drinking at one time.” On the same day, the Defendant interfered with the police officer’s performance of duties by drinking at one time, and at around 14:55 on the same day, he was arrested in a flagrant act and waiting for an investigation at the E District of the Maritime Police Station E District, the police officer called “A f.e., the police officer,” and f., the police officer’s back at one time to walk the back of the police officer G, and interfered with the police officer’s performance of duties by walking at one time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to C, F, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (presumed damage and repayment);

1. The point of destroying property under relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense: The point of obstructing business under Article 366 of the Criminal Act: Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act; Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Protective observation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;