logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.10.25 2019가합521422
임금
Text

1. The Defendant stated to the Plaintiffs in the “final sum” list of the cited amount table in attached Form 2, and as to the money, September 1, 2019.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a public corporation that performs the business of house sale guarantee and house lease guarantee, etc., and the plaintiffs are the defendant's workers.

B. The Defendant paid wages to the employees by dividing them into basic salary, job allowances, allowances (work allowances, family allowances, adjustment allowances), performance-based bonuses (in addition, performance-based bonuses, and management evaluation performance bonuses). However, in introducing the annual salary system around 2010, the Defendant changed the wage system to pay the basic annual salary consisting of the standard annual salary and job-based salary, and the performance-based incentives that are classified into performance-based bonuses and management evaluation performance bonuses.

(c)The performance-based bonus of performance-based incentives shall consist of (1) the self-performance-based bonus that pays an amount equivalent to 50 percent of the monthly basic salary (in February of each year), (2) the adjustment allowances for evaluating the performance of the previous year and paying an amount equivalent to 40 percent of the monthly standard salary in the corresponding year of payment; (3) the adjustment allowances for assessing the performance of the previous year and paying an amount equivalent to 80 percent of the monthly standard salary in the corresponding year of payment; and (4) the adjustment allowances for executive employees to pay an amount equivalent to 80 percent of the monthly standard salary in the corresponding year of payment after evaluating the performance of the previous year; and

In addition, the management evaluation performance rating of performance-based incentives has been converted from 2012 to 250% of the basic annual salary in the corresponding year of payment by evaluating workers' work performance in the previous year, and the 250% of the management evaluation performance rating was converted to 2012 to 200% of the management evaluation performance rating.

The Defendant paid legal allowances calculated only based on the basic annual salary to the Plaintiffs as ordinary wages.

E. The Defendant’s remuneration regulations and annual salary system are as follows.

[Supplementary Provisions]

arrow