logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.08.11 2017고단472
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. On August 25, 2015, the Defendant, who is engaged in the business of driving DNA car trucks, tried to change the course of a two-lane road into a two-lane course from the Asan-section surface of the south-gu Cheongcheon-si, Chungcheongnam-gu, the Southern-gu, the Southern-si, the Nam-gu, the Cheongcheon-gu, the other side of which is the high-priced side of the road.

In such a case, a person engaged in driving service was negligent in performing the duty of care as seen above while neglecting the duty of care in the field of duty to drive, and due to the negligence of performing the duty of care as seen above, the part behind the left side of the victim E driver’s Fspow drive in the top of the said car and the right side of the said vehicle in the front side of the said car and the said vehicle in the front side of the said vehicle in the opposite direction beyond the center separation limit, led the victim G driver’s Habk-pick drive’s Habk-hur-hurd part of the said vehicle in the opposite direction, and the victim I would have the front part of the victim I driver’s J-pon cargo.

As a result, the victim E suffered from the 2nd cliff, which requires approximately 12 weeks medical treatment, and the victim E cliff, the 7,670,00 won of the repair cost, and the 5,778,672 won of the repair cost of the victim G-owned car, and the 9,748,788,781 won of the cliff of the cargo vehicle owned by the victim I were damaged to each and immediately stopped and escaped without taking necessary measures such as providing relief to the victim.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence duly examined and adopted by the court, the evidence alone submitted by the prosecutor is insufficient to acknowledge each of the facts charged in this case, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this.

A. The prosecutor obtained the above stud truck driven by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) from the above studing vehicle driven by the victim E (hereinafter “victim”) and caused the instant traffic accident.

arrow