Defendant

A Imprisonment for 10 months, Defendant B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for 8 months, respectively.

However, as to the defendant A and B,

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

C On December 27, 2012, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced one year and two months of imprisonment with labor for interference with business, etc., and was released on September 30, 2013 during the execution of the sentence in the Seoul Southern Southern District Court and passed the parole period on November 28, 2012.

No one shall transfer or acquire a means of access used to make a transaction request in electronic financial transactions or to secure the authenticity and accuracy of users and the details of such transaction, unless otherwise specifically provided for in any other Act.

1. On February 2, 2015, Defendant A received a proposal that Defendant A may seek large amount of 6,50,000 won per account from Russia’s crew members from the Russia’s “K,” which is located near Busan East-gu, Busan-do.

On the 9th day of the same month, the Defendant received from K the passbook in the name of a person presumed to be Russia from K and the means of access such as physical cards, etc. from around that month to around the 13th day of the same month, as shown in attached Table 1 and attached Table 2, the Defendant received 20,000 won in advance and 7,000 won in advance and received means of access.

B. Then, around 09:10 on the 14th of the same month, the Defendant received KRW 7 million in advance of the two-use apartment 102-dong, Busan, the court north-gu, Busan, and transferred the above means of access to Defendant B.

2. On January 2015, Defendant B and C’s co-principaled Defendant C received a request from L who was known to the ordinary police officer at his/her meeting, to request for the delivery of a large passbook. The Defendants conspired to purchase a large passbook of KRW 8.50,00 per account, and then sold it to L for 1.1 million.

Defendant

B The above 1-B

As stated in Paragraph A, Defendant A received the means of access.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to the means of access.