A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Seized evidence 1 through 9, and 11 through 17 shall be confiscated from the accused.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 2018, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a person infinite name who became aware of infinites through the Malaysia’s advertisement in order to obtain profits from the Malaysia’s 41,00 pact flag (an amount equivalent to about 11,00 won in the Korean language) during one month in which he/she received money from a person infinites, thereby leading him/her to obtain profits from the Malaysia’s act of receiving money from him/her as ordered by the Republic of Korea; (b) accepted the proposal; and (c) conspired to commit a crime of “scam” in sequence with a person infinites, etc.

According to the above public offering, the Defendant entered the Republic of Korea around August 27, 2018. On August 31, 2018, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “A person in whose name the statement was made by phone calls from the victim C, and that he/she is obliged to fully repay this bond, who is the guarantor, even though he/she was aware that he/she was aware of the lending of the bond by his/her friendship, he/she shall escape and he/she is obliged to fully repay the bond.”

However, in fact, the victims did not know the bond guarantee as above, and did not contain the name influence, etc.

In order to induce the victim to do so and to let the victim do so on the street in front of the Made-dong 730-10 of the Made-dong 730-10 on the same day and deliver the defendant 15 million won at the present time, and the defendant was given the victim 15 million won at the front of the above Made-dong church in accordance with the orders of the above Made-dong under the name of the deceased.

As a result, the Defendant conspiredd with the name infinites, thereby deceiving 15 million won from the injured party.

2. In order to safely acquire damage to the tracking of the investigative agency’s money acquired through the phishing crime, the person in violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act in possession of the Defendant who sent the e-mail card connected to another person’s account, and then withdraws cash from the said account by using the e-mail card when the money is deposited into the said account.