1. On February 20, 2016, the Defendant’s expulsion disposition against the Plaintiffs is invalid.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

.I notify the details of the meetings of the Committee as follows:

- (1) - The case of receipt of a petition with the Representative’s breach of trust with respect to E’s call net business on September 10, 2015 - the case of receipt of a petition - the case of submission of content certification, application for coal, ASEAN price proposal, etc. from September 5, 2015 - the case of interference with (1) the execution department of the E-the-case project - the case of (3) the act of why why the countermeasures committee members for activation were dissatised, - the case of sending two times the certificates of contents different from the fact to the representative - (4) the interference with the execution department of the E - the case of refusal to replace the representative’s call in the absence of will, such as the cartox and text of the Handphone, etc. - the case of interference with the execution department - the affairs of the SK Telecommunication communication network signature 5) the case of refusal to attend the Council or the case of refusal to give notice to the members of the Council - the disciplinary committee with legitimate explanation.

* Related (E Regulations) Regulations - Articles 5(4)(Qualification and Restriction), 33 (Types of Disciplinary Action), 34 (Disciplinary Action), 35(4), 36(1) and 35 (Standards for Disciplinary Procedures and Allowances for Reduction or Exemption) shall follow the following procedures:

- Paragraph 4: The parties to the disciplinary action may attend the standing committee and give oral or written explanation.

When a person is dissatisfied with a disciplinary action under Article 36 (Review and Reinstatement of Disciplinary Action), he/she may request a review to the Monetary Punishment Committee in accordance with the following procedures:

- Paragraph 1: A request for review in writing must be made within five days after the date on which the disciplinary decision has been issued, and a request for review shall be extinguished upon the lapse of five days.

C. On February 20, 2016, the Defendant held a meeting of the board of directors and a meeting of the disciplinary committee at the office of the head of a private taxi branch on February 20, 2016 and held the Plaintiffs on February 20, 2016.