1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the instant case is as follows, and the judgment of the plaintiff emphasizing or putting a new argument on the grounds of appeal is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for adding the judgment as stated in Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. Thus, the court citing the reasoning of the judgment is acceptable as it is in accordance with the following provisions.

[Attachment] The part in the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows from 6 pages 15 to 7 pages 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance.

In light of the following circumstances, the Plaintiff applied for disability benefits to the Defendant on September 6, 2017, which was after the enforcement date of the amended provision ( August 9, 2017), i.e., the State and local governments may examine the Plaintiff’s disability grade pursuant to the amended provision, and (i) the guidance for disability pension business issued by the Ministry of Health and Welfare (self-reliance) after August 9, 2017, all light disability benefits applied for disability benefits should undergo a disability rating examination by the National Pension Service, and (ii) the Plaintiff is exempt from disability benefits at the time of disability rating examination by the National Pension Service on or after April 1, 2007, and (iii) the Plaintiff did not receive disability benefits at the time of disability grade 205 (the Plaintiff did not receive disability benefits at the time of disability rating 2, 2017). It appears that the Plaintiff was exempt from disability benefits at the time of disability rating examination by the National Pension Service on or after August 1, 2017).