The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged and the victim B are neighboring persons.

At around 15:00 on July 2, 2017, the Defendant followed the fact that the said victim had found in his house at the C Apartment D’s corridor, and the injured party had talked about the Defendant, and had the desire to see that he had a defect, and caused the victim’s chests to boom 2 times due to the defect of the bath, and caused the victim’s fingers to boldly go beyond the victim’s tight hand, the Defendant got about 2 weeks of the need to receive approximately 2 weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendant consistently denies the crime that there is no fact that the victim was satisfly and pushed ahead.

As shown in the facts charged in this case, B's investigative agencies and statements in this court are made as evidence.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, i.e., B, that the defendant was at the investigative agency twice his chest.

The statement was made to the effect that it is certain three times in this court, and the frequency of assault was not consistent, and ② B was subject to violence from the defendant in an investigative agency and a court, and returned to the court. However, the defendant was pushed ahead of this court.

The diagnosis was written, and the diagnosis was written, that “B’s statement and the part of injury on the overcoming her knee, etc., are not consistent with” (if we were sealed behind, they seem to have suffered from knee, etc.), and ③ E having observed the instant case appears to have been the head of the horse match between the Defendant and B, but it was not deemed that the Defendant was at the time of her hume or pushed down.

The statement was made by the Defendant, and ④ The F’s father, the Defendant’s father, stated to the effect that the investigative agency “B became in excess of B’s custody of the Defendant.” However, the police officer appeared to be “B” in this court.