Text
1. The Plaintiff, among the claims listed in the separate sheet, Defendant B shall be KRW 12,832,610, Defendant C, D, E, and F, respectively.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The deposit account in the separate sheet (hereinafter “the instant deposit”) is in the name of G, and KRW 46,547,105,500, and KRW 505,800, respectively, are deposited from the Kimcheon-si, Inc. (hereinafter “KTW Kimcheon-si”).
B. G died on September 14, 2014, and its bereaved family members were the wife Defendant B, Defendant C, D, E, and F.
[Grounds for recognition] Evidence Nos. 1-2, 2-1, 10-1, 2-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. On February 9, 2009, while the Plaintiff entered into a tobacco tobacco producers cooperative agreement with the Plaintiff on a tobacco tobacco producer agreement with the Plaintiff, the cause of the claim agreed that the Plaintiff would cultivate the tobacco in the name of G and receive the annual payment from the deposit account of this case from the K T&P site. Under the agreement, the Plaintiff cultivated the tobacco plant in 2014 and deposited KRW 47,052,905 to the deposit account of this case. The Defendants are obligated to express their intent of each transfer concerning the right to claim the payment of the deposit of this case in the amount equivalent to their shares of inheritance in accordance with the agreement on the transfer of the right to claim the payment of the deposit of this case between the Plaintiff and G, and to notify each of the above assignment to the permanent agricultural cooperatives.
3. Determination
A. As to the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the claim against Defendant B, D, E, and F, the above Defendants appears to have led to confession pursuant to Article 150 of the Civil Procedure Act. As to Defendant B’s deposit of this case (i.e., KRW 47,052,905 x 3/11), Defendant D, E, and F are obligated to express their intent to transfer their claims for payment of deposits to a permanent agricultural cooperative and notify the above assignment of claims to a permanent agricultural cooperative.
B. In full view of the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendant C’s written evidence Nos. 7 and 9, and the purport of the entire argument as to the fact-finding on the Yong-Nam Tobacco Production Cooperatives Director of this Court.