Seoul Central District Court 2012Na35728 ( October 10, 2013)

(C) No defect may be deemed to be serious and clear because the capital gains tax was reported.

(Summary of the Supreme Court Decision 201Da14488 delivered on August 2, 201, which held that the title trustee is the subject of tax payment on behalf of the title truster is illegal, but its defect cannot be deemed significant.

2013Da200810 Return of Unjust Enrichment

United Kingdom A

Korea

Seoul Central District Court Decision 2012Na35728 Decided January 10, 2013

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

All of the judgment of the court below, the appellate brief, and the records of this case, but the appellant's grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal or are recognized to be groundless, and the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

Reference materials.

If the grounds for final appeal are not included in the grounds of appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of final appeal will not continue to proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final appeal, but will not proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final