logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고법 1970. 8. 28. 선고 69나2386 제10민사부판결 : 확정
[경락허가결정에대한준재심청구사건][고집1970민(2),109]
Main Issues

Where an appeal or reappeal against a decision of permission for a successful bid is dismissed, the competent court of the lawsuit for retrial;

Summary of Judgment

Where an appeal against the decision of permission of an adjudication is dismissed, and the reappeal against it is also dismissed, a retrial against the above decision of permission of an adjudication shall fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the appellate court which has dismissed the above appeal.

[Reference Provisions]

Articles 431 and 424 of the Civil Procedure Act

Quasi-Review Plaintiff, Appellant

Quasi-Review Plaintiff

Quasi-Review Defendant, Appellant

Korea

Judgment of the lower court

Suwon District Court of Seoul District Court of the first instance (68Hun-Ba3) (Seoul District Court Decision)

Text

The original judgment shall be revoked.

The case is transferred to the collegiate division of the Seoul Civil Court.

Purport of request for retrial

The decision that rendered the Seoul Civil and Criminal District Court's branch on May 24, 1967 with respect to a compulsory auction application case for real estate auction on the same support 65ta99 shall be revoked.

On May 22, 1967, the report of this auction shall be rejected and re-auctions.

Purport of appeal

The original judgment is revoked, and a judgment like the purport of the claim is sought.

Reasons

According to the records of the auction of this case, the decision of approval of auction of this case was rendered on April 24, 1967 by the Seoul District Criminal Court's branch court. On May 30, 1967, the plaintiff of this case appealed and filed an appeal on May 30, 1967. On September 14, 1968, at the collegiate division of the Seoul Civil District Court, the plaintiff made a decision of dismissal under the same court's 67T503. The plaintiff re-appeal on September 21, 1967. However, on November 14, 1967, the Supreme Court dismissed the reappeal under the same court's 66Ma16161. Thus, it can be recognized that the decision of approval of auction of this case became final and conclusive, which is the original decision of approval of auction of this case, since the retrial court in this case's dismissal of the above appeal is subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Seoul Civil District Court's exclusive jurisdiction.

(The court of original judgment is not capable of dealing with the judgment to be dealt with by decision in addition to the exclusive jurisdiction violation.

Accordingly, according to Articles 431, 425, and 389 of the Civil Procedure Act, the original judgment shall be revoked, and it shall be transferred to the collegiate division of the Seoul Civil Procedure Act, which is the legal ground of its jurisdiction.

It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Kim Hong (Presiding Judge)

arrow