logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
red_flag_2
(영문) 광주고등법원 전주재판부 2014.3.31. 선고 2014누95 판결
정보공개거부처분취소
Cases

(former note)The revocation of revocation of information disclosure refusal

Plaintiff-Appellant

A

Defendant Appellant

The Chief of the Dosan Police Station

The first instance judgment

Jeonju District Court Decision 2013Guhap434 Decided January 8, 2014

Conclusion of Pleadings

March 17, 2014

Imposition of Judgment

March 31, 2014

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim

The defendant's refusal to disclose information against the plaintiff on January 25, 2013 shall be revoked. The decision of the first instance court that rejected the appeal shall be revoked, and the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed.

Reasons

The reasoning for the court's explanation on this case is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is citing it as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. Thus, the judgment of the court of first instance is justified as it is consistent with this conclusion, and the defendant's appeal

Judges

The presiding judge and the senior judge;

Judges Kim Jae-han

Judges Lee Jae-hwan

arrow