beta
Text
The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is published.
Reasons
1. The facts charged of the instant case [criminal record] Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two months for the purpose of evading compulsory execution at the Seoul Northern District Court on May 17, 2012, and on October 25 of the same year, the sentence became final and conclusive and is still in the current suspended execution period. Defendant B was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for the purpose of evading compulsory execution at the Seoul Northern District Court on May 17, 2012, and was released on January 30, 2013 among the set-up stations in Seongdong-gu and detained on January 30, 2013.
3. 16. The parole period expired.
[criminal act] Defendant B filed a lawsuit claiming the agreement that the victim F would pay 80 million won to the victim as Seoul Northern District Court 2010Na1546, and Defendant B transferred the registration of ownership transfer to Defendant A, on April 14, 2011, the Seoul Jung-gu G apartment 101 Dong 1112 (hereinafter “instant apartment”) owned by himself prior to the judgment, to evade compulsory execution.
However, on March 21, 2012, the Seoul Northern District Court rendered a judgment on March 21, 201 to implement the procedure for registration of cancellation of ownership transfer registration for the apartment of this case by the Seoul Northern District Court 201Da33235, and the judgment became final and conclusive around that time.
In addition, the Defendants were indicted on October 28, 201 with the Seoul Northern District Court on the charge that they falsely transferred or acquired the instant apartment for the purpose of evading the victim’s compulsory execution, notwithstanding the absence of any obligation or obligation as above, and the judgment of conviction was finalized as a crime of evading compulsory execution, such as the record of the criminal records.
Ultimately, even though the Defendants did not have any obligation relationship with each other and were convicted of having been convicted of having evaded compulsory execution, Defendant A filed a lawsuit claiming a loan with the Seoul Eastern District Court on August 16, 2012 to pay KRW 78 million to Defendant A, and Defendant B recognized the obligation of Defendant B.