Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendants are acquitted.

Punishment of the crime

[Relation and Related Litigations] Defendant A was a full-time member of D E-Appellee (representative F, hereinafter referred to as the "E-Appellee") located in the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and now he was a Dong company, and Defendant B is the secretary general of the E church.

G (hereinafter referred to as “G”) as a U.S. navigational organization was affirmed on March 16, 2012 by appointing H (hereinafter referred to as “H”) as a legal representative at the U.S. local law office in the Mano-Mano-Mano-Man Roym (hereinafter referred to as “H”) and filing a civil lawsuit (hereinafter referred to as “instant U.S. lawsuit”) against Defendant A and Ecom Association. On March 16, 2012, “Ecom Association and Defendant A shall pay USD 14,179,726 and interest, litigation costs, etc. to G.” The judgment became final and conclusive as Defendant A and Ecom Association did not appeal.

On the other hand, in accordance with the above final judgment in the United States, G filed a lawsuit claiming a judgment of execution (hereinafter “instant civil lawsuit”) to the effect that on March 20, 2012, G appointed Law Firm I (hereinafter “I”) as a legal representative, and that “I would be permitted to enforce compulsory execution based on the U.S. judgment that became final and conclusive to pay USD 14,179,726 and interest, litigation costs, etc.” against E-I and the Defendant at the Seoul Northern District Court on May 29, 2012.

【Criminal Act】

1. The Defendants in collusion with the Seoul Northern District Court on July 27, 2012, as the documents attached to the preparatory documents by the attorney L, a law firm K, the attorney of the instant civil lawsuit, ① as the documents attached to the attached documents in the name of the representative M lawyer, which is a private document on the certification of the forgery, and one copy of “the final proposal of the I document related to the lawsuit of the E branch” (hereinafter referred to as “the documents in this case”; 686 through 687 pages) and attached documents. The warrant of detention of the K director, the Seoul Northern District Court’s decision at the Seoul Northern District Court, and the Seoul High Court’s decision at the Seoul High Court.