1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a press organization that issues a “label”, which is a major periodical in the capital market, and the Defendant is an online newspaper, which mainly reports news related to the two-dimensional industry.

B. On May 20, 2016, on the Defendant’s Internet homepage (htp:/www.hyunch.co.co.), the Defendant reported an article identical to that stated in attached Table 1 (hereinafter “instant article”) with the title “The physical part of the body, the level” is another sacrificeed, but is another sacrificeed.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 to 3, and 7 evidence, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion was intended to slander the Plaintiff, and the Defendant reported the instant article containing false facts as follows:

1. The Plaintiff reported, on a yearly basis, an irregular and factual basis concerning the physical part of a corporation, Inc. (hereinafter “the physical part of a corporation”) (hereinafter “the physical part of a corporation”).

(hereinafter referred to as “the first article”). 2. There is doubt about the background of the news report, not for the Plaintiff to obtain a paid lecture or an advertising cooperation with respect to the body-based by borrowing an article from an article.

(hereinafter “Contents 2”) 3. The Plaintiff is under investigation by the prosecution due to the spread of will, the right to lectures, and the suspicion of undermining corporate activities.

(hereinafter “Contents of the third article”). 4. Industry provides a kind of rule that if the Plaintiff reports the articles related to the company, it should place an advertisement on the website or buy the old accounts.

The plaintiff reports a critical engineer thoroughly to a non-cooperative company in advertising and supporting.

(hereinafter “Contents 4”) 5. The Plaintiff occupied the third and the third negative press in the outcome of the investigation into the actual damage caused by the similar press act in 2015, which was published by the Advertising Association.

The plaintiff is a similar press that the plaintiff gets dead.

(hereinafter “Contents 5”). The above Defendant’s news reports are images of a press organization, and they are images of the media organization.