logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2017.06.13 2017고정181
위계공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 24, 2017, the Defendant: (a) sent a telephone call to 112, which is the number of the police emergency call call call call number, using a cell phone (E) used by the Defendant within the D main point in Chuncheon City, around 16:23, 2017; and (b) sent the police as soon as possible.

In other words, a false report was made to interfere with the performance of official duties by deceptive means.

2. On March 25, 2017, the Defendant 112, the police emergency call number No. 15, a mobile phone (E), used by the Defendant, posted the phone number No. 112, a mobile phone number No. 15, which was used by the Defendant, at around 04:36, Chuncheon, thereby hindering the performance of official duties through a deceptive scheme by putting a false report.

3. On March 25, 2017, the Defendant: (a) posted a telephone at the same place in the same manner; and (b) reported false information at the place of a port in the same manner; and (b) obstructed the performance of official duties by deceptive means by reporting the false report.

4. On March 25, 2017, the Defendant appears to have written indictment around 05:51 on March 25, 201, and around 15:51 on March 25, 201.

B. In the same manner at the place of a port, the phone calls made a false report, thereby obstructing the performance of official duties by fraudulent means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the arrest report of the occurrence of the case, the list of the case reported, the list of the case reported, and the investigation report (verification of the suspect call

1. Relevant Article 137 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts, Article 137 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In full view of all the circumstances, including the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the frequency of crimes by the defendant, the degree of official duties consumed by the defendant, the obstruction of execution of official duties during the suspension of execution due to the crime, and the fact that the defendant is a recipient, and the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., as set forth in the arguments of this case, the sentence is imposed.

arrow