beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
Seized evidence 1 to 8 shall be confiscated.
1,600,000 won from the defendant.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2015 Highest 2046]
1. On January 7, 2012, the Defendant posted a letter on the Defendant’s residence located in Gangdong-gu Seoul, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, 301, stating that “E sells capitals at KRW 3.4 million on the Internet website’s mid-top bulletin board “E” and false statement was made to the Defendant F, who reported and contacted the above letter, as if he were to sell the said camera and siren.
However, since the defendant did not own a camera and siren, even if he received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell it.
Nevertheless, the Defendant received 3.4 million won from the injured party to the national bank account in the name of G on the same day.
Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.
2. On May 20, 2012, the Defendant sold 420,000,000 won of NAV AV-H on the bulletin board “H” on the NAV-H bulletin board.
“After posting the article, the victim I who reported and contacted the above article, made a false statement as if he were to sell the above golf loans.
However, since the defendant did not own golf loans, even if he received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell it.
Nevertheless, the Defendant received 420,000 won from the injured party to the national bank account in the name of G on the same day.
Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.
3. On March 9, 2013, the Defendant loaned 30 million won to the victim J because he/she could get a lot of profit by lending a power to workers engaged in entertainment establishments, etc. in the trade in French-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government at the non-affiliated coffee shop. Around March 9, 2013, the Defendant would pay interest of 30% per month.
1. As seen, the Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the Plaintiff was “.”
However, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the injured party, it is thought that most of the borrowed money will be used for the personal purpose.