A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On December 7, 2016, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million as a crime of violating road traffic law (drinking driving) in the public order of Daejeon District Court on December 7, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. On October 17, 2020, the Defendant: (a) driven the E in the state of alcohol 0.138% of alcohol concentration in blood from around 200 meters from the C’s adjacent road located in Gongju-si B to the D’s front road at the same time; (b) on October 17, 2020, the Defendant driven the E-Wstar knick under the influence of alcohol content at around 0.138%.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drinking alcohol driving regulations not less than twice.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle in the Ethrosch Rexroth.

On October 17, 2020, the Defendant was parked on the right side of the direction of the running of the Defendant while driving the above mar while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.138% at around 05:00 and driving the above mar in the state of alcohol, and facing the front side of the official city at official city, and driving it at an indefinite speed depending on one-lane.

F The front side of the Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do has been parked in the front side of the above Do Do Do Do Do Do , and continuously parked on the same side

H The first part of the IK5 car owned by H, the second part of the driver's seat of the K5 car in K, the front part of the L-owned M 5 passenger car, the front part of the N-owned M 5 passenger car, the N-owned OF car in front of the upper right side of the said car, and the above G M 5 passenger car in the first part of the repair cost, to the extent that the repair cost of the above M 3,296,249 won, such as the I K5 car exchange, etc., were destroyed to the extent that the above M 3,296,249 won was destroyed, and the above O 5 car was destroyed to the scrapping of the vehicle, and without leaving the place where the vehicle in question was scattered on the road in the condition that the vehicle in question was scattered.

Accordingly, the defendant did not take necessary measures even though he caused a traffic accident.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement against the defendant;