Of the facts charged in the instant case, each of the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents against Victims C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, and K.

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the Nando-lurd passenger vehicle.

A. A. On May 2, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Egressing Vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S. after an accident) (U.S.) around May 22:52, 2015, the Defendant driven the lurged Vehicle at the above A.S. on May 22:52, 2015, and made the left turn to the left at the right right of the 4-lane road from the direction of the new road along the folklore.

At the time, since the driver was at night and at the time, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving after checking the right and the right and the right of the driver while driving the motor vehicle well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive the vehicle while driving the vehicle in one lane prior to the driving direction by negligence, and received the part behind the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the victim L(33 Do) driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim L and the passenger M& (34 years and inn) respectively, due to the climatic salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment. At the same time, the Defendant did not immediately stop the car and escape without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victims, even if the repair cost, such as repair of the clifs, was damaged to the extent that the clifs were above to the extent that the clifs were damaged.

B. On May 2, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”), driving a motor vehicle of the upper Adodo Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do do Do Do Do do Do Do

Since there is a long distance intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care for those engaged in driving of a motor vehicle to drive the motor vehicle safely in accordance with the signals by reducing speed and by properly examining the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so.