logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.06.15 2016나6557
손해배상금 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: Gap evidence No. 17 and No. 18, which are insufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion as additional evidence submitted in the trial of the court of first instance, are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant A is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claim against the defendant A and the claim against the defendant B are dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow