1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, while operating a resting restaurant in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam is the owner of "D", which is a so-called "diet Damb", which is a multi-party employee, to arrange sexual traffic in the process. Defendant B and E, etc., at that place, have been employed as an employee of the above "D" on the condition that the price received as a commercial sex is divided one half by having sexual intercourses, such as sexual intercourses and sexual intercourses, introduced by Defendant A from Defendant A, and sexual intercourses such as sexual intercourses, etc.

1. On March 3, 2018, Defendant A (Violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) followed by F to the effect that the Defendant reported and contacted the said “D” advertisements operated by his/her female to the effect that it would allow the F to engage in commercial sex acts at KRW 1.60,00 per hour.

After that day, the Defendant was going to put in B, who is an employee employed by her female to engage in sexual traffic in the Gel H room in the same day, and B received 1.60,000 won as she was from F in the above H room in the above H room, and conducted sexual traffic by means of oral intercourse, sexual intercourse, etc.

In addition, from February 22, 2018 to December 26, 2012 of the same year, the Defendant had female employees, such as B and E, engage in sexual traffic with an unspecified number of men, such as F, etc. over a total of 10 times in the same manner as indicated in the attached list of crimes, and obtained profits equivalent to KRW 16,662,00 among them.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. Defendant B (Violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) received 160,000 won from F as chemicalized at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) of the said Article, and committed the act of mouth intercourse and sexual intercourse with F.

Accordingly, the defendant committed sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A suspect interrogation protocol of I and E by each prosecutor;

1.F.