Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On December 13, 2016, at around 22:55, the Defendant: (a) 22:55, at the “C cafeteria” located in the Gumi-si B, she took a bath on the restaurant floor; (b) she takes a time room to other customers; and (c) assaults D, a restaurant proprietor, etc.; and (d) upon receiving a report from 112, the Defendant was asked about personal information and the circumstances of the case, etc. from the background F, etc. of the E zone belonging to the Gu police station of the U.S., the Defendant 112, “A customer and the principal are wraped; and (c) she took a bath to ask him/her to return home on the back of the back of the back, and assaulted twice again the back of F’s body, which is to attract the Defendant who was under the influence of alcohol.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F or D;

1. G statements;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the job site of E earth;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the degree of interference with the execution of official duties in the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Provisional Payment Order, the fact that there was a record of being sentenced to a fine once as a crime of damaging public goods in 2009, once as a crime of damaging public goods in 209, the fact that the injured police officer received a letter, reflects the fact that the injured police officer received a letter, the fact that the injured police officer committed any contingent act by drinking only, and other circumstances such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment