1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. Survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses that the Defendant rendered to the Plaintiff on January 7, 2013.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 6, 1982, the Plaintiff’s husband (hereinafter “the Plaintiff’s husband”) served as the Jinhae viewing D from August 6, 1982. On March 7, 2001, the Plaintiff suffered from “brain color” and received medical care until February 9, 2012 after being recognized as an occupational disease from the Defendant. The Plaintiff’s husband was determined as class 2 subparag. 5 of the disability grade (a person who is obliged to receive from time to time nursing due to a significant obstacle in the function or mental function of a new system).

In addition, on February 10, 2012, the Defendant determined the subject of preventive management until February 9, 2014, on the ground that cerebral typhism of the Deceased constitutes a serious disability caused by negophal damage pursuant to Article 77 of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act.

B. Meanwhile, from April 4, 2012, the Deceased was hospitalized in G Hospital on June 20, 2012, when being hospitalized due to cerebral fladation and its post-treatment, the Deceased went out after obtaining permission from his/her guardian to going outside the hospital. During the process of returning to G Hospital, the Deceased was diagnosed as “sulved pressure fladation” and was diagnosed as “defladation” on July 20, 2012.

After that, on October 16, 2012, the Deceased died of “waste” as a direct death on October 16, 2012.

C. On November 29, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendant for the payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses on the ground that the deceased’s death constitutes occupational accidents. However, on January 7, 2013, the Defendant rendered a site-based disposition (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

The Plaintiff filed a request for examination against the instant disposition, but was dismissed on July 2013, and the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee filed a request for reexamination to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee, but was dismissed on November 14, 2013.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap 1, 2, 9, 10 evidence, Eul 1 through 3 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. This.