Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, only 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 25, 2017, Defendant B instructed Defendant B, within the “E” house located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, 19:30 on November 25, 2017, Defendant B, who was sexually imprisoned against the victim A (the victim of 49 years of age) who was working for the same workplace, and the victim respondeded to the horse at the end of half-yearly, Defendant B was at the time when the victim’s face was bread with the victim’s breath seat and bread with the victim’s face.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as the victim’s unclaimed days of treatment (i.e., a son’s escape).

2. Defendant A was faced with the victim B(58) at the same time and place as above, and as such, Defendant A was faced with the victim B(58). Defendant A was faced with the victim’s face, head, and chin.

As a result, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer from the 21-day injury to the face’s reputation and scambling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the crime of this case is committed by the Defendants, who are workplace fellows, and the case of assaulting and injuring each other, and the nature of the crime is not somewhat weak. The Defendants had the record of criminal punishment for the same crime even before, Defendant B first assaulted Defendant A, Defendant B’s degree of injury suffered by Defendant B, and that the degree of injury suffered by Defendant B was not weak.

On the other hand, the defendants recognize the crime of this case and reflects the mistake, and they do not want the punishment of the other party by mutual agreement, and they do not repeat the same mistake again.

It is favorable to the Defendants.

The above circumstances and other circumstances are the defendants' age, sex, environment, family relationship, and crimes.