Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was dead from May 2016 to September 2017 with the victim E.

1. The Defendant, at around September 10, 2016, was the victim’s head office in the G “G” interior room located in the Maternist City F in the Maternist City on September 10, 2016

The compensation for the defect hedging has been changed, and the victim said, “The victim has been frighted to store the contents of the letter and to know the internal relationship to the NAS.”

The Defendant issued a letter to the effect that, in terms of the consideration that he takes place from a person suffering from a fright drinking, the Defendant would pay a total of two million won per month to 10,000 won, and would not raise an objection against her husband if he/she fails to do so.” On September 15, 2016, the Defendant received a remittance of KRW 200,000 to the account in the name of the victim used by the Defendant in accordance with the above letter.

Accordingly, the defendant received property by threatening the victim.

2. From October 4, 2016 to around 14:00 to around 14:00, the Defendant stolen the victim’s house at the victim’s house of H and 101, on the ground that the victim did not make a lump sum payment of the amount stipulated in each written statement prepared as referred to in paragraph (1) but did not change the victim’s laundry, etc., which would bring about a theft in the total amount of KRW 4.84,00 in market price, such as a laundry owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Recording of the witness E's statement in the third public trial records;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution (one time);

1. A detailed statement of the offender's place and -112 reported case handling;

1. Determination as to the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel against the stolen site photographs, seized articles photographs, and E written evidence prepared by the suspect A

1. Summary of the assertion

A. The Defendant, at the end of the victimized person, thought that the Defendant was married to the marriage, was able to see how and how and how the Defendant was able to see their emotionality and cost, and the victim voluntarily made a written statement, and there was no fact of threatening the victim.

B. The defendant's consent.