logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.01 2016누48999
유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

On the fourth level of the judgment of the first instance court, it is not sufficient to recognize that the business owner recommended or forced the deceased to drink during the instant short-term competition only with the descriptions of Gap evidence 17 and Gap evidence 21-1 through 7 as follows, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

Part 5 of the judgment of the first instance court "after the arrival of the intention of the prosecution" shall be "after the arrival of the intention of the prosecution."

2. The judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow