logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 장흥지원 2018.05.31 2018고단50
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant who interfered with the business due to a traffic accident is a person who was hospitalized in D Hospital in the former Heung-gun C from February 22, 2018.

Notwithstanding the warning of the hospital, the Defendant was requested to discharge the Defendant from the hospital by drinking alcohol and smoking eggs, despite the warning of the hospital that the Defendant would not drink alcohol in the hospital.

On February 24, 2018, from around 11:40 to around 11:50 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the treatment of the medical staff of the victim DNA hospital by force for about 10 minutes by avoiding the disturbance, such as: (a) the Defendant raised an objection to the demand for discharge from the hospital 2; and (b) the Defendant released the nurse at the same time; and (c) the Defendant released the shot from the hospital her; and (d) the Defendant took a bath at a large amount of time on the shot of the shot of the shot of the shot of the shot of the shot of the shot of the shot of the shot of the 10-minute of the 10-minute force.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the parking lot of the above D Hospital around 12:00 on February 24, 2018, after receiving a report of interference with the duties under the above paragraph (1), went out of the hospital by police officers, such as the police officer in the position of the E District in the Southernnam Police Station, and the Defendant’s wife G.

After that, while the defendant tried to go to the parking lot along with the defendant's wife, the defendant tried to go to the hospital again while she expressed "I impule, I am dead, I am to the hospital."

Accordingly, when the above police officers prevented the Defendant, the Defendant “Iskh’s hand?”

Such a dogblings and one set

“Along with sound, the fulbage of the F, and assaulted the victim’s nose on one occasion by the Defendant’s head.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the prevention of crimes and maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A H statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (in cases of statements of victims, field photographs, etc., attaching photographs of damaged parts, and telephone conversations with witnesses I);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

arrow