logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2016.04.12 2016고단335
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Obstruction of business;

A. On March 4, 2016, from around 00:30 to 00:40 on March 4, 2016, the Defendant was dissatisfied with the Defendant’s business and found the Defendant’s complaint as to the issuance of the Defendant’s notice of KRW 50,000 of the penalty due to the Defendant’s report of the victim’s disturbance in drinking at the Epic City from around 00:30 on March 4, 2016, and from around 00:40 on March 4, 2016, the Defendant had been forced to do so.

“Alongly sound, the disturbance caused inconvenience to customers by avoiding disturbance, and thereby interfered with the victim’s business operations by force.

B. On March 6, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s business operation by force from around 18:30 on March 6, 2016 to 18:35 on the same day, and found the victim for the foregoing reason in the above room from around 18:30 on the same day, thereby causing the victim to “a fine due to a scarcity, was paid,” and the disturbance was caused to the victim so as to cause inconvenience to customers’ use of the disturbance at times, thereby obstructing the victim’s business operation.

2. On March 6, 2016, at around 18:38, the Defendant: (a) expressed that “A police officer of the net Police Station F patrol box, who was called out after receiving a report of interference with the duties on the road in front of the building in front of the said building, was sent back, and was able to take back home from G, who was called “A police officer of the net Police Station F patrol box, who was flaged for returning home”, “A police officer of this flag, who was a police officer of the flag, would not be flag; (b) the flag would not act as a police officer; and (c) the flag would threaten G’s face to flag by taking a flag of G.

Defendant continued to stop on the above road, did not put back the back door of the patrol vehicle, and G expressed that “I am Ga, I am Ga, I am Ga, I am Ga, I am am Ga, I am Ha, I am son, I am son, I am son.” The Defendant am laved on the front glass and Bos of the patrol vehicle, and obstructed the patrol vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression, and maintenance of order of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1...

arrow