A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

Punishment of the crime

On May 29, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for an injury at the Seoul Western District Court, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on October 1 of the same year. On June 30, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for an injury.

around 13:20 on November 12, 2018, the Defendant, “2019 Highest 931,” drinked with the homeless in front of the “C” located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, with the homeless, and forced the victim to commit an indecent act.

"2019 Highest 1593"

1. Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act;

A. On February 17, 2019, at around 22:25, the Defendant brought a dispute at a cream of “F” restaurant located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, along with “F” restaurant, and at a cream of the victim G (54 years of age) under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant brought an injury to the victim, such as a cream of 7,8, and a cream of cry at approximately 9 weeks on the left side of the victim’s face, distribution, and side cream of the victim in drinking with the said cream of the said cream.

B. At around 22:30 on March 5, 2019, the Defendant ordered the Defendant to enter the state of alcohol as “I” located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, but the Defendant would not sell alcoholic beverages to the Defendant on the grounds that the Defendant would interfere with the drinking business. However, the Defendant: (a) reported that the Defendant would not sell alcoholic beverages to the Defendant on the ground that the Defendant would interfere with the drinking business; (b) the Defendant would not sell alcoholic beverages to the Defendant; and (c) the Victim K (year 73) would sell alcoholic beverages only to the Defendant; and (d) when the Defendant was making a call out of the restaurant, the Defendant would report that the Defendant would come out of the restaurant and the victim would be 112 of his business interference; (b) while making a protest against the Defendant’s failure to sell alcoholic beverages to J, the Defendant would have been able to report the Defendant as 112 of his/her business interference; and (c) 6) the victim’s chest and bucking the victim’s chest and the buck.

C. The Defendant.