logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.11.05 2015구합10761
이주대책대상자제외처분 취소
Text

1. The Defendant’s disposition of excluding those subject to relocation measures against the Plaintiff on February 11, 2015 is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 15, 2010, the outline of the project was changed to the “Yong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G and D” following the launch as of July 1, 2014 at the Cheongbuk-gun, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongbuk-si, Cheongbuk-do, by Article 7 of the Industrial Sites and Development Act, as the project was announced B through the notification of Chungcheongbuk-do.

The original land was designated as E and announced as E, and the main contents thereof are as follows:

(i) Project name: E development project (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”);

(2) Location: 3,31,701 square meters in size: The president of the Chungcheong Development Corporation from 2007 to 5, 2015; the project operator of the project area of 3,331,701 square meters in size:

B. The Defendant’s implementation plan for the establishment of relocation measures and the selection of a person subject to relocation measures on July 2014: In principle, the building owner who continues to reside in a residential building from the date of public announcement of designation of the E district ( October 15, 2010) to the date of conclusion of the contract or the date of expropriation (including cases where his/her family lives except for his/her residence while continuing to reside in the house owned in the relevant project district)) shall be entitled to the classification of the building without permission and the building with permission for the alteration of the purpose of use as a lawful building before January 24, 1989, which is deemed lawful building before and after January 24, 1989, as a non-exclusive building (Article 6(2)) to the extent that it is not possible to distinguish the eligibility of the building without permission and the building with permission for the alteration of the purpose of use as a legitimate building before and after January 24, 1989.

C. The instant disposition No. 1) The Plaintiff is an unauthorized container 1, toilet, and screen room (hereinafter referred to as “the instant disposition”).

arrow