1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 24, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for building permit (hereinafter “application for building permit of this case”) with the head of Suwon-si, Suwon-si (hereinafter “the head of the Defendant”) in order to construct a Class I neighborhood living facilities on the ground of Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the State-designated Cultural Heritage Zone / Class I district unit planning zone (B), and 14 square meters of D forest land (hereinafter “each of the instant lands”), which is owned by the Plaintiff, as the specific use district under the National Land Planning and Utilization Act and the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, with the aim of constructing a Class I neighborhood living facilities of two stories on the ground of Suwon-si, the Suwon-si, the State-designated Cultural Heritage Zone / Class I district unit planning zone (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. On December 24, 2015, the Defendant issued a supplementary notice to the Plaintiff stating that “The result shall be shipped after deliberation by the Building Committee pursuant to Article 5-5(1) of the Enforcement Decree of the Building Act and Article 11(1) of the former Building Ordinance of Suwon-si (amended by Ordinance No. 3598, Sep. 28, 2016; hereinafter the same shall apply)” was “the shipment date.”

C. On January 7, 2016, the Plaintiff submitted an application for assistance in the construction, repair, etc. of hanok to the head of the Sinwon-si (hereinafter “the head of the Defendant’s place of business”) pursuant to Article 18 of the Ordinance on the Support of Hanwon-si (hereinafter “instant application for assistance”) (hereinafter “the head of the Defendant’s place of business”). On January 27, 2016, the Sinwon-si Committee rendered a decision on the Plaintiff’s application on January 27, 2016 on the ground that the Plaintiff’s newly built hanok is likely to impair the sexual landscape because the Plaintiff’s newly built hanok had a higher level than the height of the outer space of harmony (hereinafter “the instant decision on postponement”). On February 2, 2016, the head of the Defendant’s place of business notified the Plaintiff of the aforementioned deliberation results.

On the other hand, the Plaintiff mentioned above B.

As the result of deliberation by the Building Committee was not submitted by the deadline for supplementation, the defendant head of the Gu shall undergo deliberation by the Suwon-si Committee pursuant to Article 11 (1) of the Building Ordinance by February 1, 2016 to the plaintiff by February 26, 2016.