1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Details of the disposition;

(a) Designation, etc. of an urban renewal acceleration zone - District name: G financial expense promotion zone - Designation date, designation: Public Notice of Seoul Metropolitan Government on September 22, 2011 - Designated Area: Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I but 36,266§³ (hereinafter referred to as the “instant rearrangement zone”): Housing redevelopment project; Housing redevelopment project;

B. The Plaintiffs are owners of land, etc. defined in subparagraph 9 (a) of Article 2 of the former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (wholly amended by Act No. 13912, Jan. 27, 2016; hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) in the instant rearrangement zone.

On May 11, 2012, the head of Yeongdeungpo-gu (hereinafter referred to as the “head of the Defendant”) approved the composition of the Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project Promotion Committee (hereinafter referred to as the “instant Promotion Committee”) for the purpose of establishing the redevelopment partnership to implement housing redevelopment improvement projects within the instant rearrangement zone.

C. On April 15, 2016, J in the instant rearrangement zone, the owners of land, etc. in the instant rearrangement zone, to the Mayor of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Defendant Mayor”) on April 15, 2016, Article 4-3(4)2 of the Urban Improvement Act, and the former Seoul Special Metropolitan City Ordinance on the Improvement of Urban and Residential Environments (amended by Ordinance No. 6407, Jan. 5, 2017; hereinafter

) A request was made to cancel ex officio the designation of the instant rearrangement zone pursuant to Article 4-3(3)4 of the Act.

(hereinafter “instant request”). A total of 309 owners of the land, etc. in the instant improvement zone identified the total number of the initial owners of the land, etc. in the instant improvement zone as 315 (Evidence No. 9 and Evidence No. 1) but thereafter corrected in the course of the opinion survey as seen below.

(Evidence A No. 10). 118 written consent was attached. D.

On May 12, 2016, the defendant market in receipt of the above application shall make a residents' opinion in relation to the application for cancellation.