logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.10.10 2013고합305
배임증재
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the representative director of F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “F”) that produces and supplies components of a ship, such as UNI-STRUT, which are structures in the ship room, and G is the chief of the material management team of H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “H”), a shipbuilding company, who takes charge of ordering the purchase of steel scrap and the allocation of the quantity of steel scrap contracts from April 2005 to July 2013, and I is the chief of the material management team of H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “H”), who exercises the authority to approve orders and the allocation of quantities from January 27, 2010 to April 3, 2012.

1. The Defendant issued KRW 20 million and KRW 30 million in total and KRW 50 million to G, respectively, to G, with an unlawful solicitation to the effect that “The Defendant, from the beginning of the year to August 2012, 200, provided that “At a mutually influent restaurant in which he had a person related to the vessel, talk well about the persons related to the vessel, thereby allowing them to establish a list of the company’s oil, which is not a product of a foreign competitor, and in the future, to exclusively supply a large quantity of oil.”

Ultimately, the Defendant made an illegal solicitation with respect to the duties of G managing another person's business and granted KRW 50 million to the Defendant.

2. Around November 20, 201, the Defendant issued KRW 5 million to the Defendant’s car within the Defendant’s car to the F Office located in Daegu-gu Seoul-gun District Court Decision 2000,000 to the effect that “The Defendant, within the Defendant’s car, would be married to the F Office located in Daegu-gu-gu, the Defendant issued a false solicitation to the effect that “I would be well able to give a large number of strings, so I would be in good standing, and would be able to deliver a large number of strings, and that G, a person in charge, would be able to take a monthly measure for the approval.”

After all, the defendant made an illegal solicitation with respect to the I's duties to handle another's business and provided five million won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of G, I and K;

1. I Hasp. Hasp.

arrow