A fine of three million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On October 7, 2010, at around 01:0, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the part of the victim, such as a cage cage cage cage 7, which requires approximately six weeks of medical treatment on the part of the victim, in front of toilets located in the gambling house opened by G in the underground floor of the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F building.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by a witness H in the second trial records;

1. Statement made by a witness I in the third protocol of the trial;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. The portion not guilty under Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention in a workhouse;

1. The summary of this part of the facts charged is that, upon receiving a demand from the victim on October 7, 2010 to return five million won from around 01:00, the Defendant brought about before the victim, and that, “the victim himself/herself gets back of five million won in cash from the next part of the victim’s money, 50,000 won in cash from the next part of the victim’s money when he/she got out of the lag before the death of the lag. He/she borrowed the laver in advance before the death of the lag.

The evidence supporting this part of the facts charged lies in the victim's investigative agency and court statement. However, the victim filed a complaint against the defendant after 20 days or more, and the victim decided to make a false statement to the effect that the defendant is detained together with J, K, L, I, and I around November 2010, as stated in the judgment of the court, around the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court. The victim, the victim, and I immediately appeared in the Geumcheon Police Station and testified to the effect that I had presented the victim's right to be Mari from H to the effect that the victim was present at the Parkcheon Police Station, and I was present at the victim's right to be Mari, as stated in the judgment of the court, and the police officer was dispatched to the police, but the victim was killed.