logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.08.16 2013고단1465
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence 1 and 2 shall be confiscated, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall distribute or use a game product not rated by the Game Rating Board, and even if he/she does not exchange the result obtained through the use of the game product, the defendant conspired to operate C and the game room, and the defendant takes charge of business, such as money exchange and profit management, and C divide the role by the method of customer's care and divide the role from March 22, 2012 to March 26, 2012 to the day from March 22, 2012 to the day from March 26, 2012, he/she provided 32 game instruments in which he/she can implement the outdoor game product not rated by the Game Rating Board, and provided 10% of the fee to customers, and exchanged the score obtained by the customers through the use of the game product in cash.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. E statements;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports, etc.;

1. Relevant Article on criminal facts, Articles 44 (1) 2, 32 (1) 1, 30 of the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry Selection and Punishment, Article 30 of the Criminal Act ( point of providing game products not rated), Articles 44 (1) 2 and 32 (1) 7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

2. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

3. The reason for sentencing under Article 44(2) of the Act on the Promotion of Confiscation Industry and Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act does not include any circumstances that may be considered in light of the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant led to each of the crimes of this case, and the period of operation of the game of this case is not long. However, the operation of the illegal game room, such as the crime of this case, is an excessive speculative spirit.

arrow