A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall distribute or use game products which have not been rated by the Game Rating Board, and exchange the results of tangible or intangible obtained through the use of game products as a business.

Nevertheless, from January 6, 2015 to January 21, 2015, from January 214, 2015, the Defendant: (a) installed four game equipment for “marine camping” and 15 game equipment, which are game products not rated on the second floor of the building located in Si-si; (b) and (c) exchanged KRW 4,500, which deducts 10% of the total, by calculating the score obtained through the use of the said game equipment as KRW 5,000 per 5,000.

As a result, the defendant provided game products not classified for use, and exchanged tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 44 (1) 2 of the relevant Act on criminal facts, Articles 32 (1) 1 (which provides game products not rated) of the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry for the Selection of Punishment and Punishment, Article 44 (1) 2 of the Game Industry Promotion Act and Article 32 (1) 7 (which exchange the results obtained through the use of game products) of the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry, and the selection of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;

1. Article 44 (2) of the Confiscation Industry Promotion Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 44 (2) of the Act on the Promotion of Additional Collection, that the defendant has been convicted of the same suspension of execution in 2009, the scale and period of the business of this case, the degree of profits the defendant acquired, and other ages, character, conduct and environment of the defendant;