logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.03.07 2018고단2614
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 29, 2018, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at a 04:39% alcohol concentration, driven a F-crick vehicle from a nearby parking lot located in Gyeonggi-si B to an E-cafeteria in the same city D from around about 500 meters to the same city, at around 00 meters.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a F-Korean cruise car.

On October 29, 2018, at around 04:39, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol as described in paragraph (1), and led the Defendant to drive it on the fourth-lane road in front of the E-cafeteria located in Gwangju City, G, along two-lanes.

Since there is a long-distance intersection where the central line is installed, there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle to the person engaged in driving service and reduce the speed in advance to prevent the accident.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant, while neglecting this, was driven by the victim G (33 years of age) who was driven by the next wing line due to the negligence in the course of duty driven by the central line, was driven by the Defendant as the front part of the passenger car in front of the passenger car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the above victim, such as salt ties, tensions, etc., which require two weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. G traffic accident-related statements;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Traffic accident report (1) and report on the circumstances of the driver concerned, investigation report (report on the circumstances of the driver concerned), and report on the detection of the driver concerned;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. In the indictment of this case, Article 3 (1) and the proviso of Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 2 and 8 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the applicable provisions of Acts are not stated in the indictment of this case, but Article 3 (1) and the proviso of Article 3 (2) 8 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

arrow