Defendant

A Imprisonment for four months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 5,000,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. Joint crimes committed by the Defendants

A. On April 23, 2017, at the convenience store operated by the victim D (Woo, 37 years of age) in Busan Island around 00:05 on April 23, 2017, the Defendants who interfered with their business affairs are the horses and disputes of the Defendants from this F.

I would like to hear the word “”; (b) Defendant A set the convenience store display stand when drinking the word “F; and Defendant B could not let customers entering the place for 10 minutes by avoiding disturbance, such as gathering goods displayed on the display stand.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the convenience store business of the victim.

B. The Defendants, at the time and place of the above paragraph (a) above, listened to the words “if a police officer has been interested and frighted, there is any fear that he had been a police officer,” and Defendant A, at his own interest, expressed a large amount of h’s desire to take the said h’s shot, and subsequently assaulted Defendant B, at the time and place of the above paragraph (a) above, the 112 police officer’s 1st century’s knife of the G knife of the G knife of the G knife of the G knife of the G knife of the G knife of the knife of the knife of the knife.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

2. Defendant A’s sole criminal act on April 23, 2017: (a) around 00:10 on April 23, 2017, within the Busan Coastal Police Station G District located in Busan J, Busan, the Defendant does not have only sprinke.

We am "I am a large day," and assaulted the above K's back on one occasion by walking the door from K to the police officer belonging to the above earth.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the police officer's management of the police officer's home.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to D, F, H, K, and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs (Interference with convenience stores);

1. Relevant provisions of the Act concerning facts constituting the crime;