A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 31, 2016, the Defendant driven a DNA halog car with alcohol content of 0.182% while under the influence of alcohol from around 02:05 to the three-story underground of the Cnart located in the Busan B’s YY-gu, Busan, Busan, on the street, around 02:05.

2. Interference with the performance of official duties by police officers E, and the accused was parked there in a three-story parking lot located in Busan Metropolitan Government B at around 02:30 on the same day with a driving width and a halogen car.

F-owned G U.S. LAF conflict with the latter part of the car, and F reported 112 as it appears that the Defendant would have driven alcohol.

The defendant, upon receipt of a report 112, wishes to go to a toilet to the slope E belonging to the Busan Coastal Police Station H District;

In other words, they assaulted the police officer's legitimate performance of duties, such as quizzing the E's face with his own hand, and interfered with the above police officer's legitimate performance of duties, and at the same time, they have flicked the face and the arms' flive body that require treatment for about seven days for the above E ( South, 44 years old).

3. The Defendant who interfered with the performance of official duties by police officers I was arrested in the act as referred to in paragraph (2) in H District located in the Busan BJ on the same day at around 03:10 on the same day and was transferred to the police officer, and the Defendant wants to go to the toilet for the police officer.

In addition, I, a police officer belonging to the said district guard, was accompanied to a toilet inside the district guard.

Defendant 2 committed assault in the above toilets, such as taking a bath to I, taking I’s buckbucks twices, and bucks at her bucks, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to E, I, K, and L;

1. A report on the detection of a primary driver;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. A damaged photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (as to attachment of a written diagnosis of injury of victim E);

1. Article 136(1) and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, and Articles 148-2(2)2 and 44 of the Road Traffic Act.