logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2016.09.28 2016고정314
업무방해
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Defendant

A fails to pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the chairman of the Emergency Measures Association for the Development and Improvement of F Housing Units in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, and Defendants B, C, and D are all the members of the Emergency Measures Association.

Defendants: (a) in collusion, around 16:00 on March 11, 2015, at H’s inside and outside of the J operated by the head of the association in the Changwon-si G, Changwon-si, the head of the association in the Changwon-si; (b) on the ground that their real estate appraisal was low; (c) and (d) approximately 30 other members of the association on the ground that the appraisal of land and buildings was low; and

An appraisal is the outline of appraisal.

The victim interfered with the operation of the meat store by force by avoiding the disturbance between approximately 25 minutes, such as the expression “a large sound.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness H, I, and K;

1. Each statement made to H, K, and I by the police;

1. USB (hereinafter referred to as such video) and USB (Audio) (hereinafter referred to as the Defendants and the defense counsel asserted that the Defendants’ act constitutes a legitimate act permitted under the social norms, but according to each of the above evidence, the Defendants’ act was an urgent and inevitable means to ensure that the Defendants’ act was a legitimate act, as a requirement for the act.

As can not be seen, the Defendants and defense counsel’s above assertion cannot be accepted. Thus, the above assertion by the Defendants and defense counsel cannot be accepted.

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 314 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the confinement of a workhouse (Defendant A);

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant A)

1. Suspension of sentence (Defendant B, C, and D);

(a) Punishment to be suspended: 300,000 won per fine;

(b) Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of each Criminal Act (100,000 won per day);

C. Grounds: Article 59(1) of each Criminal Code (no history exists in relation to Defendant B, C, and D’s age, Defendant B, and C, and Defendant D had no record of force except for those subject to a fine once, and the circumstances leading to the instant crime, the degree of participation in the instant crime, etc.)

arrow