logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.08.10 2017고합180
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 12, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Western District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 9, 2017.

The defendant is the representative director of C (Co., Ltd. D after the change).

The Defendant, while aware that it is necessary to display and sell foreign printed goods, Korean cosmetics, clothing, and miscellaneous goods (hereinafter “tax-free goods”), etc. to be displayed and sold in the tax-free zone in the tax-free zone in the Republic of China, the Defendant, a Chinese corporation that jointly operates E in the tax-free zone in the Republic of China, Hanam-si, the Republic of China, and “G,” which is a Korean corporation, can supply the victims with tax-free goods, such as name goods, and acquired money from the victims for the purchase cost of goods and the distribution cost.

The defendant around January 4, 2016, at the G Office of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H and B 101, the defendant is three years of age in the house that he invested at the time when the chairperson of the L Group M first establishes the L Group M, and the inside of Korea is three years of age.

Therefore, the N may supply less than 50% of the sales price of the N-site.

In addition, as experts in domestic trade are responsible for the head of G's passbook and seal impression in corporation G, the delivery will be performed on behalf of the general customs clearance.

"Falsely speaking," and 3, Jung-gu, Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, was issued by K the name passbook and the corporate seal impression in the coffee shop near the station.

However, the defendant was not three years of age, and there was no experience in the process of logistics clearance, and there was no intention or ability to properly supply tax-free goods such as well-known goods handled N to the victim through normal customs clearance.

The defendant deceivings employees belonging to the victim to purchase goods on or around January 6, 2016.

arrow