The punishment of the accused shall be determined by four months of imprisonment.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 25, 2016, the Defendant, against the victim B, would give phone call to the victim B, who operates the original exporter/import company C, at an infinite time (hereinafter referred to as the “C”) and pay the price to the police officer by the beginning of the following month.

1. As seen, the Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the Plaintiff was “.”

However, the facts revealed that the Defendant was liable to pay approximately KRW 100 million at the time, and that the maximum amount of the claim reaches KRW 70 million was established, and there was no property except multi-household houses with no value as collateral. Since the Defendant was planning to use the sale proceeds of the original company as a repayment for the existing obligation, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the price to the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) received the Defendant’s deception from the victim, thereby deceiving the victim; (b) received the Defendant’s victim, who was in an infinite D, the amount of KRW 6,536,376 at the market price in C’s logistics warehouse; and (c) received the Defendant’s delivery of a re-finite yarn equivalent to KRW 5,328,892 at the market price in the above logistics warehouse around March 4, 2016; and (d) received the Defendant’s delivery of a re-fined yarn equivalent to KRW 8,262,775 at the market price in the above logistics warehouse on the 11th of the same month.

As a result, the Defendant was given property worth KRW 20,128,043 by deceiving the victim.

2. On May 4, 2016, the criminal defendant against the victim E calls from the victim E, who is an offender, at a Buddhist land on May 4, 2016, there is insufficient customs costs to ensure that the victim E clears the original intention imported from China.

A loan of KRW 2.5 million shall be repaid one month after the date of loan.

1. As seen, the Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the Plaintiff was “.”

However, the facts are that the Defendant was liable to pay approximately KRW 100 million at the time, and the maximum amount of the claim reaches KRW 70 million, except multi-household houses with no value as collateral, and there was no specific property, and the amount borrowed from the damaged is not a customs clearance fee of the original company that newly received the money from the injured party.