logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.11.12 2015고단4687
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of two months.

8,500,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 4687"

1. On August 11, 2014, the Defendant violated the Attorney-at-Law Act: (a) around 17:00, at the D restaurant located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the Defendant arranged to appoint an attorney-at-law who will endeavor to promptly release her husband F, who is under detention investigation due to a violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act; and (b) received cash from her female, and arranged to appoint a G attorney-at-law in the Southern-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu.

As a result, the defendant introduced the parties or other interested persons to a specific attorney-at-law.

2. Around October 2014, the Defendant, who violated the Attorney-at-Law Act, made a false statement to the effect that “I will not impose a fine,” and that “I will defend against the judgment,” as if the Defendant was an attorney-at-law who received a summary order of KRW 700,000 from the Incheon District Court’s general civil petition office located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Office of Education-Support (Seoul) as a result of the crime of injury.”

However, the defendant was not a lawyer, and thus he was not a lawyer.

On October 29, 29 of the same year, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, handled 20,000 won to the new bank account under the name of the Defendant from the victim, and 2 million won to the above account on November 17 of the same year, respectively, by taking over 2.2 million won in total from the above account as attorney fees, and by taking money and other valuables as well as preparing legal counseling and legal documents with respect to the litigation case.

"2015 Highest 5793"

1. On August 1, 2014, the fraud Defendant made a false statement to the victim I who suffered damage by fraud at a mutually infinite restaurant located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Incheon, stating that “A victim I may be compensated for 100% if he/she files a complaint by fraud, and shall be punished by fraud. The chief prosecutor is a relative with the chief prosecutor and may immediately resolve the damage because the connection is broad on the inspection and warning.” On the following day, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim at an infinite place.

arrow