A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On May 6, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Ulsan District Court, and was sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Ulsan District Court on November 19, 2010, and completed the execution of each sentence at the Daegu Prison on July 6, 201.

"2014 Highest 3571"

1. Fraud against the victim C;

A. On May 21, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim stating that “Slsan-gu DBx will be leased to the victim” at a place of address not exceeding Ulsan-gu.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to lease the above real estate to the victim, and even if he received the deposit from the victim, he was thought to use it as living expenses.

The defendant received 5 million won as the deposit money from the victim, that is, from the victim.

B. On May 26, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was the victim at the place of address in Ulsan or lower, and the victim was the victim.

If a person who resides in an immovable property fails to meet the director's expenses due to the absence of the director's expenses, he/she will pay the director's

However, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay a director fee from a person who resides in the above real estate, and even if he received the money from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to do so. The Defendant received KRW 1 million from the victim, i.e., the Defendant received from the victim, who was in his seat. 2. On June 13, 2014, the Defendant: (a) on the part of the victim E, the Defendant was the victim in G located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; (b) was a gold intermediary business operator; and (c) received the money from the business operator located in Busan, etc. and received the money from the business operator located in Ulsan-gu, Busan, etc., and (d) would make profits from the money.

‘A false statement' was made.

However, the fact was that the defendant was not a gold intermediary but a gold intermediary, and even if he received money from the victim, he was thought to use it as living expenses.

The defendant is suffering from the victim, namely, 70,000 won from the seat.