Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of one million won, and the defendant B shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is an employee in the “Curel” and Defendant B is not an employee in the “Curel,” and no one may engage in, or provide a place for, any other business activities that disturb public morals, such as having male and female juveniles lodge together with them.

1. On February 11, 2017, the Defendant, at around 01:30, committed a business act that disturbs public morals by enabling the Defendant in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, a male, whose name cannot be identified in “Curel” where he works as an employee, and a juvenile, E (V 17) who is a juvenile, to be accommodated in the heading room 203, F (51), and G (V 17 years old) who is a juvenile, to be accommodated in the heading room 204.

2. Defendant B, who is an employee of the Defendant, engaged in the Defendant’s business activities that interfere with public morals by having the Defendant married with the foregoing juveniles on the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer in relation to G;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 58 Subparag. 5 of the Juvenile Protection Act, Article 30 Subparag. 8 of the same Act, and the selection of fines

B. Defendant B: Article 62, Article 58 Subparag. 5, and Article 30 Subparag. 8 of the Juvenile Protection Act

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, applicable to the order of provisional payment;