logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.12.09 2015고단2741
상습절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 00:36 August 11, 2015, the Defendant habitually stolen the victim E’s PC inside the “D” bank located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, by taking advantage of the gap between toilets, and by taking one gallon lusian lusium 1,00,000 won of the market value of the victim’s possession, the victim’s gallon jus around 1,00,000 won. Moreover, the Defendant habitually stolen the victim’s market value from July 23, 2015 to August 29, 2015, in total of 7,950,00 won of the market value, the victims owned.

2. Fraud or violation of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act;

A. At around 13:06 on July 27, 2015, the Defendant, even though there was no intent or ability to pay the price, presented H’s SCCF card as indicated in the attached Table 3 to the employee as if he was his credit card, and signed the sales slip and used the stolen credit card amounting to 3,500 won.

B. On July 27, 2015, around 13:10 on July 27, 2015, the Defendant presented the SCCB card under the above paragraph (a) to the proprietor as if he were his credit card and signed the sales slip as if he were his credit card, and used stolen credit cards.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of K;

1. Each statement of E, L, H, M, N,O, P, Q, R and S;

1. A report on occurrence (32 No. 1 of the evidence list);

1. A criminal investigation report (CPC analysis), internal investigation report (CCTV verification), investigation report (Attachment of photographs on the surface of the track), investigation report (CCCTV image analysis), investigation report (CCCTV image analysis), and investigation report (Attachment of On-the-spot CCTV data);

1. Two copies of receipt; and

1. CCTV images, CCTV photographs, and CCTV;

1. Habituality of judgment: The application of Acts and subordinate statutes is recognized in light of the defendant's criminal records (which has already been punished for habitual larceny in 2009), the number and frequency of crimes, and the repeated crimes of the same several methods;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow